now we will learn more lessons of the “empty yet fertile space”. everything that occurs occurs here. this space. this psychic universe, microcosm, investigation, divine hope sanctuary work table …
we’re spending a lot of time, focus on Beginning (Hexagram 3) because and because and because …
for one thing, this is about the private and public, the deconstruction of the private public opposition — the bleeding between private and public. it is also about the name as well as haunting, repetition (compulsion) and death (drive).
all of the themes articulated by Derrida and Freud (Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis). this is also why Derrida’s Archive Fever is quoted in markforshee2.wordpress.com
we spend time, focus, energy on and with Beginning (3) because this hexagram and reading, question and answer and answers of process psychic and pneumatic, stands out. we can see its head and maybe begin to make out the detailed lines of its face.
Beginning (Hexagram 3) was/is the answer to our question about working with markforshee1 and markforshee2 wordpress blogs.
we asked because we were uncertain. we had changed the name of the first blog and we had added a new blog and now neither were appearing on google and we werent sure what the (eventual) status of markforshee2 would ever be.
we had the idea of what we were doing , or trying to do. we understood the “place” that markforshee2 was supposed to occupy. there are updated versions of the scriptures 2015 with a more linear and “complete” inclusion of the lines from the book of John. it is also the “place” for Derrida’s Archive Fever. The verses from the Bhagavad Gita appear in both blogs.
these blogs are a spiritual exercise. we know that. these blog posts are also letters — letters to God, to the powers that be, to the Other, to the Self.
Some Derrida quotes may seem more appropriate than others. there is “purpose” to the seemingly awkward inclusions ans positions. there is always the spirit of irony/paradox and there is that strange (re)reading that deconstruction provokes. this is also to say , again, that we are not making “arguments” here. we are always playing with multiple meanings and ways of framing meaning. and so , for example, in Scriptures 2015 – 95 – we find Derrida talking about the strategy of the logic of Freud’s pleasure principle and reality principle relationship, telos, rhythm , “contract” … it is to be understood that these terms are meant in the sense on which they are “defined” in Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle. the quote from Derrida , there at the bottom of the quotes, that make up that scripture and the footnotes, seems particularly “out of place” but it is meant to play in its awkwardness , as the piece that doesnt fit. and of course, this quote is also about the “death drive”. the ghost texts of the death drive is not present but is implied. ok, Baudrillard may appear again as we pursue our “discussions”. for now, let us return to the Beginning.
———————————————-
COMMENTARY ON THE SYMBOL
———————————————
Clouds and thunder fill up.
In correspondence with this,
The superior person plans and sets things in order.
———————————————
Yao Text
———————————————
Top Six
Mounting on horses,
Still not going forward.
Weeping grievously,
Shedding tears as if bleeding.
–
Sheds tears as if bleeding.
How long can it endure?
—————————————-
what emotional world is communicated through this brief initial meaning provided for the transitional line in the top/6th line (our only transitional line in this reading)?
there is further explanation provided for this at the end of the final reading (here we are reading Alfred Huang’s translation/commentary).
the situation is never simple. this transitional line takes us to Hexagram 42 (Increasing).
we read, consult and understand the I Ching in light of the Chi energy and the structure (buoyant as it is) that it presumes. we “believe” and we follow and we entertain the dialogue between the Tao and Vedanta (always already with the deconstructive third).
the intertext continues. as we know, the I Ching is its own collection of divergent and harmonious intertexts. in our case, the intertext expands toward Other , which is ultimately Self.
and so we will quote from the commentary on our transitional line from hexagram 3 :
—————————————
Top six. Beginning alternates to Increasing (42)
—————————————-
since one has already reached the uppermost position, one should not feel sorry about being unable to go forward or turn back. One must realize that when things reach an extreme they will alternate to the opposite. For this reason, the I Ching always calls for restraint before going too far.
(pg.65)
——————————————–
how do we interpret this passage?we have the latent and manifest meanings. we always have Derrida and Freud (and Jung) reading over our shoulders.so , perhaps with irony, it seems that we must continue. we’re not there yet. we’re on the way.-
–
our transitional line is at the “top position” (line 6), so we read the commentary within the context of the structure that we work with/in.
–
we have more to read and more to consider. we must read from text which came to us “before” this top six commentary.
it seems we must read and address the large SIGNIFICANCE section from Hexagram 3. we still work with Beginning. and then we move to the natural transition of Hexagram 42 (Increasing).
–
and then we must “finally” address our initial “answer” to our most general question (Hexagram 52 transitioning to Hexagram 11.) which led to questions/answers taking us to Beginning.