‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ ‘He that cometh after me is preferred before me, for He was before me.’ He Who comes after me has priority over me, for He was before me. [He takes rank above me, for He existed before I did. He has advanced before me, because He is my Chief.]’
(John 1:15)
–
producing these remains and therefore the witnesses of my radical absence, to live today — here and now, this death of me
(Jacques Derrida)
–
There is a time for being ahead, a time for being behind; a time for being in motion, a time for being at rest; a time for being vigorous, a time for being exhausted ; a time for being safe, a time for being in danger.
(Tao Te Ching)
–
it is what I have called the translation contract: hymen or marriage contract with the promise to produce a child whose seed will give rise to history and growth.
(Jacques Derrida)
–
On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise him, he was named Jesus, the name the angel had given him before he had been conceived.
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the Child, His name was called Jesus, who was so named by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.
And when the eight days were complete that The Boy should be circumcised, his name was called Yeshua, which he was called by the Angel before he would have been conceived in the womb.
(Luke 2:21)
–
And he said to me, “These words are trustworthy and true. And the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, has sent his angel to show his servants what must soon take place. And behold, I am coming soon.”
(Revelation 22:6)
–
The question of the question is more vast and stems from procedures of translation and theoretico-practical issues that join up at the borders (of several disciplines) that they destabilize.
(Jacques Derrida)
–
ask the tender
cloud
(William Blake)
–
It follows, certainly, that Freudian psychoanalysis proposes a new theory of the archive; it takes into account a topic and a death drive without which there would not in effect be any desire or any possibility for the archive. But at the same time, at once for strategic reasons and because the conditions of archivization implicate all the tensions, contradictions, or aporias we are trying to formalize here, notably those which make of it a movement of the promise and of the future no less than of recording the past, the concept of the archive must inevitably carry in itself, as does every concept, an unknowable weight. The presupposition of this weight also takes on the figures of “repression” and “suppression,” even if it can not necessarily be reduced to these. This double presupposition leaves an imprint. It inscribes an impression in language and in discourse. The unknowable weight which imprints itself thus does not weigh only as a negative charge. It involves the history of the concept, it inflects archive desire or fever, their opening on the future, their dependency with respect to what will come, in short, all that ties knowledge and memory to the promise.
(Jacques Derrida)
–
You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.
(John 14:14)
–
And when the eight days were complete that The Boy should be circumcised, his name was called Yeshua, which he was called by the Angel before he would have been conceived in the womb.
(Luke 2:21)
–
And he said to me, “These words are trustworthy and true. And the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, has sent his angel to show his servants what must soon take place. And behold, I am coming soon.”
(Revelation 22:6)
–
Before you can know anything directly, non-verbally, you must know the knower. So far, you took the mind for the knower, but it is just not so. The mind clogs you up with images and ideas, which leave scars in memory. You take remembering to be knowledge. True knowledge is ever fresh, new, unexpected. It wells up from within. When you know what you are, you also are what you know. Between knowing and being there is no gap.
(Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj)